Digital Tomosynthesis

Digital Tomosynthesis: Medical Imaging with 3D Precision

Digital tomosynthesis (DT) is a cutting-edge imaging technique that has emerged as a powerful tool in the field of medical diagnostics. This article delves into the technical intricacies of digital tomosynthesis, exploring its principles, advantages, and applications. From the fundamental concepts to the advanced technologies that drive this imaging modality, this article by Academic Block will uncover the inner workings of digital tomosynthesis and its impact on medical imaging, making it a valuable tool in various medical specialties, including radiology, oncology, and orthopedics.

1. Overview of Digital Tomosynthesis

Digital tomosynthesis is an advanced form of tomography, a technique that captures cross-sectional images of the human body. The word “tomosynthesis” is derived from the Greek words “tomos,” meaning section or slice, and “synthesis,” meaning the process of combining. In essence, digital tomosynthesis synthesizes three-dimensional images from a series of two-dimensional X-ray projections, providing a clearer and more detailed view of the internal structures.

2. Principles of Digital Tomosynthesis

2.1 X-ray Source and Detector: At the core of digital tomosynthesis is the use of X-rays to capture images of the human body. An X-ray source emits a controlled dose of ionizing radiation, which passes through the body and is detected by a specialized image receptor. The detector records the intensity of the X-rays that traverse the body, generating a two-dimensional projection image.

2.2 Tube Movement: Unlike traditional X-ray imaging, where the X-ray source and detector remain stationary, digital tomosynthesis introduces controlled movement of the X-ray tube and detector. This movement is typically an arc or linear motion, allowing for the acquisition of multiple projection images from different angles.

2.3 Image Reconstruction: The acquired projection images are then processed through a reconstruction algorithm to generate a three-dimensional image dataset. The reconstruction process involves combining the information from various projections to create sectional images, revealing internal structures with improved clarity and detail.

3. Technical Components of Digital Tomosynthesis

3.1 Detector Technology: Digital tomosynthesis relies on advanced detector technologies to capture high-quality projection images. Flat-panel detectors, which consist of amorphous silicon or amorphous selenium, are commonly used in modern digital tomosynthesis systems. These detectors offer high spatial resolution and sensitivity to X-rays, contributing to the overall image quality.

3.2 X-ray Tube: The X-ray tube is a critical component of digital tomosynthesis systems. It produces a controlled and focused X-ray beam that penetrates the patient’s body. Modern X-ray tubes are designed to deliver consistent and adjustable radiation doses, ensuring optimal image quality while minimizing patient exposure.

3.3 Motion Control System: The controlled movement of the X-ray tube and detector is facilitated by a precision motion control system. This system ensures smooth and accurate motion, allowing the acquisition of projection images from various angles. The synchronization between the X-ray tube and detector movement is crucial for successful image reconstruction.

3.4 Reconstruction Algorithms: Sophisticated algorithms play a key role in the reconstruction of three-dimensional images in digital tomosynthesis. Iterative reconstruction algorithms, such as filtered back projection and algebraic reconstruction technique (ART), are commonly employed to enhance image quality and reduce artifacts. These algorithms optimize the utilization of acquired projection data to reconstruct detailed and accurate sectional images.

4. Advantages of Digital Tomosynthesis

4.1 Improved Image Quality: One of the primary advantages of digital tomosynthesis is the superior image quality it offers compared to traditional two-dimensional X-ray imaging. By capturing images from different angles and reconstructing them into a three-dimensional dataset, digital tomosynthesis provides a more comprehensive and detailed view of anatomical structures.

4.2 Reduced Overlapping Structures: In conventional X-ray imaging, overlapping structures can hinder the interpretation of images, leading to potential diagnostic challenges. Digital tomosynthesis minimizes this issue by selectively focusing on specific planes of interest, reducing the overlap of structures and improving the visibility of abnormalities.

4.3 Lower Radiation Dose: Digital tomosynthesis allows for the optimization of radiation dose delivery to the patient. By tailoring the X-ray beam to the region of interest and utilizing advanced reconstruction algorithms, digital tomosynthesis achieves diagnostic image quality with a lower radiation dose compared to traditional computed tomography (CT) scans.

4.4 Dynamic Imaging Capability: Unlike static two-dimensional images, digital tomosynthesis enables dynamic imaging by capturing sequential images over a specific period. This capability is particularly valuable in applications such as musculoskeletal imaging, where the assessment of joint movement and function is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

5. Mathematical equations behind the Digital Tomosynthesis

The mathematical equations behind digital tomosynthesis involve principles from computed tomography (CT) and are based on the process of reconstructing three-dimensional images from a series of two-dimensional projections. The most common mathematical technique used for this purpose is filtered back projection. Here, I’ll provide an overview of the mathematical concepts involved:

Projection Equation: The projection equation describes how a two-dimensional projection image (P) is formed from a three-dimensional object (f) by the action of the X-ray system. Mathematically, this can be represented as:

P(θ,s) = −∞ f(x,y) ds ;


      • P(θ,s) is the projection image at angle θ and distance ss from the rotation axis.
      • f(x,y) is the attenuation coefficient of the object at position (x,y).
      • The integral is taken along the X-ray path.

Filtered Back Projection: The process of back projection involves the reconstruction of the three-dimensional object from its two-dimensional projections. This is done by reversing the projection process, and filtering is applied to improve image quality. Mathematically, the filtered back projection can be expressed as:

f(x,y) = 0π [ (1/s) −∞ P(θ,s) cos⁡(θ − θ0) dθ] ds ;


      • f(x,y) is the reconstructed image.
      • P(θ,s) is the measured projection image.
      • θ0 is the angle of the X-ray beam.
      • The double integral is performed over all angles θ and distances ss.

Iterative Reconstruction: Iterative reconstruction methods are also used in digital tomosynthesis, where the reconstruction process involves an iterative optimization algorithm. Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (ART) and simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) are examples of iterative methods. Mathematically, the iterative reconstruction process can be written as:

Update x(k+1) = x(k) + λ AT{b − A x(k)} ;


      • x(k) is the reconstructed image at iteration k.
      • A is the system matrix representing the imaging geometry.
      • b is the measured projection data.
      • λ is a relaxation parameter.

Filtered Sinogram: In the case of digital tomosynthesis, the data is often represented in the form of a sinogram, and filtering is applied to this sinogram before back projection. The filtered sinogram (P(θ,s)) can be expressed as:

P′(θ,s) = Filter{P(θ,s)} ;

The choice of filter (e.g., Ram-Lak, Hann) depends on the desired characteristics of the reconstructed image.

These mathematical equations represent the foundational principles behind digital tomosynthesis image reconstruction. The specific implementation may vary depending on the system design and the reconstruction algorithm employed. Advanced techniques, such as statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction, are also being explored to further improve image quality and reduce radiation dose.

6. Applications of Digital Tomosynthesis

6.1 Breast Imaging: Digital tomosynthesis has become a game-changer in breast imaging, offering a more detailed and nuanced view of breast tissue compared to traditional mammography. In breast tomosynthesis, the technique enhances the detection of subtle lesions, reduces the impact of overlapping structures, and provides a more accurate assessment of breast abnormalities.

6.2 Orthopedic Imaging: Orthopedic applications of digital tomosynthesis include the evaluation of musculoskeletal conditions, such as fractures, joint disorders, and spinal abnormalities. The ability to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions aids orthopedic surgeons in treatment planning and ensures a more comprehensive understanding of the patient’s condition.

6.3 Pulmonary Imaging: Digital tomosynthesis is increasingly employed in pulmonary imaging to assess lung conditions and abnormalities. The technique offers improved visualization of lung nodules, better differentiation of pulmonary structures, and reduced interference from overlapping tissues, making it a valuable tool in the diagnosis of respiratory disorders.

6.4 Dentomaxillofacial Imaging: In dentistry and maxillofacial imaging, digital tomosynthesis provides detailed three-dimensional views of the teeth and facial structures. This is particularly beneficial for the assessment of dental fractures, temporomandibular joint disorders, and implant planning, offering dentists and oral surgeons enhanced diagnostic capabilities.

7. Challenges and Future Directions

7.1 Limited Soft Tissue Contrast: While digital tomosynthesis excels in visualizing bony structures, its ability to differentiate soft tissues is somewhat limited compared to other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ongoing research aims to enhance soft tissue contrast in digital tomosynthesis through advanced reconstruction techniques and improved detector technologies.

7.2 Integration with Artificial Intelligence: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital tomosynthesis is an area of active exploration. AI algorithms have the potential to streamline image interpretation, assist in lesion detection, and optimize reconstruction processes. Future developments may see the convergence of digital tomosynthesis with AI, leading to more efficient and accurate diagnostic workflows.

7.3 Continued Technological Advancements: The field of digital tomosynthesis is dynamic, with continuous technological advancements aimed at further improving image quality, reducing radiation dose, and expanding its applications. Innovations in detector technology, motion control systems, and reconstruction algorithms are expected to drive the evolution of digital tomosynthesis in the coming years.

Final Words

Digital tomosynthesis represents a significant advancement in medical imaging, offering three-dimensional insights that enhance diagnostic accuracy across various medical specialties. From its fundamental principles involving X-ray sources and detectors to the technical components of motion control systems and reconstruction algorithms, digital tomosynthesis has revolutionized the way healthcare professionals visualize and interpret medical images.

In this article we have seen that as the ongoing research and technological developments continue to shape the landscape of digital tomosynthesis, the potential for further improvements in image quality, diagnostic applications, and integration with artificial intelligence remains promising. The journey from two-dimensional to three-dimensional imaging has opened new horizons in medical diagnostics, and digital tomosynthesis stands at the forefront of this transformative evolution. Please
provide your comments below, it will help us in improving this
article. Thanks for reading!

Digital Tomosynthesis

Hardware and software required for Digital Tomosynthesis

Hardware Components:

  1. X-ray Source: A high-quality X-ray tube capable of producing controlled and focused X-ray beams is a fundamental component.

  2. Detector: Flat-panel detectors, typically based on amorphous silicon or amorphous selenium technology, are commonly used in modern digital tomosynthesis systems. These detectors capture the transmitted X-rays to create projection images.

  3. Tube and Detector Motion Control System: Precision motion control systems are essential for controlled movement of the X-ray tube and detector during image acquisition. This motion is typically an arc or linear motion, allowing the acquisition of multiple projection images from different angles.

  4. Patient Support System: A platform or table on which the patient is positioned for imaging. The support system may allow controlled movement to optimize the imaging process.

  5. Image Reconstruction Hardware: High-performance computational hardware is required to execute the complex reconstruction algorithms. This can include dedicated processors or GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) capable of handling the computational load efficiently.

  6. Display System: High-resolution medical-grade displays are used by radiologists to interpret and analyze the reconstructed digital tomosynthesis images.

  7. Power Supply and Cooling Systems: The X-ray source and other components generate heat and require appropriate cooling systems. Additionally, a stable power supply is crucial for consistent performance.

Software Components:

  1. Acquisition Software: Software that controls the X-ray source, detector, and motion control system during the image acquisition process. It may also include features for adjusting imaging parameters.

  2. Reconstruction Software: Algorithms for processing and reconstructing two-dimensional projection images into three-dimensional datasets. Common techniques include filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction.

  3. Image Processing Software: Tools for enhancing and optimizing the quality of reconstructed images. This may include noise reduction, contrast adjustment, and other image enhancement techniques.

  4. Viewer Software: Software for viewing and interpreting digital tomosynthesis images. It should allow radiologists to navigate through the reconstructed datasets and analyze them in detail.

  5. Integration with PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System): Integration with PACS allows for the storage, retrieval, and distribution of digital tomosynthesis images within the healthcare enterprise.

Facts on Digital Tomosynthesis

Principle of Operation: Digital tomosynthesis involves capturing a series of X-ray projections from different angles as the X-ray tube and detector move in controlled motion. These projections are then reconstructed into a series of cross-sectional images, providing a three-dimensional view of the imaged anatomy.

Evolution from Analog Tomosynthesis: Tomosynthesis has its roots in analog tomosynthesis, which used conventional film-based imaging. The transition to digital tomosynthesis brought significant improvements in image quality, accessibility, and the ability to manipulate and store digital images.

Applications in Breast Imaging: Digital tomosynthesis is widely used in breast imaging, particularly in mammography. It helps overcome limitations of traditional mammography by reducing overlapping breast tissue, improving lesion visibility, and providing better characterization of suspicious findings.

Reduced Radiation Dose: Compared to traditional computed tomography (CT), digital tomosynthesis typically involves a lower radiation dose. This makes it a preferred option for certain imaging applications where repeated scans may be necessary.

Orthopedic Applications: Digital tomosynthesis is utilized in orthopedic imaging for evaluating musculoskeletal conditions, such as fractures, joint disorders, and spinal abnormalities. Its ability to provide detailed views of bony structures aids in diagnosis and treatment planning.

Dynamic Imaging Capability: Digital tomosynthesis allows for dynamic imaging by capturing sequential images over time. This capability is valuable in applications where the assessment of movement, such as joint dynamics, is critical for diagnosis.

Improved Lesion Detection: In breast imaging, digital tomosynthesis has demonstrated improved detection of lesions, especially in dense breast tissue. The technique enhances the visualization of subtle abnormalities that might be challenging to identify in traditional mammography.

Integration with 3D Printing: The three-dimensional datasets generated by digital tomosynthesis can be integrated with 3D printing technology. This integration facilitates the creation of physical models for surgical planning and education.

Ongoing Research and Development: The field of digital tomosynthesis is dynamic, with ongoing research focused on improving image quality, developing advanced reconstruction algorithms, and expanding its applications. Researchers are also exploring the integration of artificial intelligence for image analysis.

Combination with Other Modalities: Digital tomosynthesis is sometimes used in combination with other imaging modalities, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to provide a more comprehensive assessment of certain conditions.

Digital Tomosynthesis in Lung Imaging: Digital tomosynthesis is finding applications in pulmonary imaging for assessing lung conditions. It offers advantages in visualizing lung nodules, improving differentiation of pulmonary structures, and reducing interference from overlapping tissues.

Key Figures behind Digital Tomosynthesis

The origins of tomosynthesis can be traced to the work of Dr. G.N. Hounsfield, who is often regarded as one of the pioneers of computed tomography (CT) imaging. In the early 1970s, Hounsfield and his colleague Dr. A.M. Cormack developed the mathematical principles that laid the foundation for CT scanning, a technique that produces detailed cross-sectional images of the body.

While Hounsfield’s work focused on CT, tomosynthesis, in various forms, began to emerge in subsequent years. Digital tomosynthesis, as it is known today, has evolved with advancements in digital imaging technology and computational techniques.

In the context of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), which is a specific application of digital tomosynthesis used in breast imaging, Dr. Per Skaane, a Norwegian radiologist, and Dr. László Tabár, a Swedish radiologist, made significant contributions to its development. Their work in the 1990s and early 2000s helped establish the feasibility and benefits of using tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Academic References on Digital Tomosynthesis

Niklason, L. T., Christian, B. T., Niklason, L. E., Kopans, D. B., Castleberry, D. E., Opsahl-Ong, B. H., … & Wirth, R. F. (1997). Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology, 205(2), 399-406.

Yaffe, M. J., & Mainprize, J. G. (2014). Digital tomosynthesis: technique. Radiologic Clinics, 52(3), 489-497.

Dobbins III, J. T., McAdams, H. P., Godfrey, D. J., & Li, C. M. (2008). Digital tomosynthesis of the chest. Journal of thoracic Imaging, 23(2), 86-92.

Alakhras, M., Bourne, R., Rickard, M., Ng, K. H., Pietrzyk, M., & Brennan, P. C. (2013). Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?. Clinical radiology, 68(5), e225-e236.

Vedantham, S., Karellas, A., Vijayaraghavan, G. R., & Kopans, D. B. (2015). Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology, 277(3), 663-684.

Friedewald, S. M., Rafferty, E. A., Rose, S. L., Durand, M. A., Plecha, D. M., Greenberg, J. S., … & Conant, E. F. (2014). Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. Jama, 311(24), 2499-2507.

Dobbins III, J. T., & Godfrey, D. J. (2003). Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Physics in medicine & biology, 48(19), R65.

Skaane, P., Bandos, A. I., Eben, E. B., Jebsen, I. N., Krager, M., Haakenaasen, U., … & Gullien, R. (2014). Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology, 271(3), 655-663.

Godfrey, D. J., Yin, F. F., Oldham, M., Yoo, S., & Willett, C. (2006). Digital tomosynthesis with an on-board kilovoltage imaging device. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 65(1), 8-15.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x