How Trump’s Tariffs on India hurting U.S. and Boosting China
Overview
On August 27, 2025, the U.S. under President Trump increased tariffs on Indian imports raising them to 50% citing India’s continued purchases of Russian oil. The tariff hike has affected various Indian sectors from textiles and gems to chemicals, disrupting exports and threatening jobs.
At the same time, it is driving up costs for U.S. consumers and squeezing American companies that depend on imported inputs. Experts are concerned that while the U.S. and India are locked in a trade battle, China may gain strategic advantage, as India can now deepen ties with Beijing amid strained U.S.-India relations. Such shifts could erode U.S. global influence while reshaping trade routes, market competition, and supply chain resilience. New policy choices by US now will determine long-term geopolitical and economic balance. At this delicate moment, understanding India’s irreplaceable role compared to other allies of America is more important than ever.
Importance of India in comparison to other allies in China’s neighbourhood
India is unique in the global architecture. It has a democratic power, World’s fastest growing economy large-market state, massive internal market and a youthful workforce. Compared with other American allies such as Japan, Taiwan, or South Korea:
India provides a vast market and manpower base that can host manufacturing and services at volumes those smaller economies cannot match. In addition, India offers strategic depth on China’s western and southern approaches which geography and military posture complicate Beijing’s regional calculations.
India’s political independence makes it a strategic partner that can bridge multilateral groupings, from the Quad to G20, in ways other allies cannot easily replicate. To understand the importance of India in any global alliance you can refer the graph and the table below.
It can be seen that losing India as ally therefore cannot be compensated by gaining other smaller allies, and it is an open substitution problem. The above data suggests that a sidelined India reduces the collective capacity of democracies in Asia to act as a counterweight to Beijing.
After understanding India’s unmatched strategic weight among U.S. allies in Asia, it becomes important to explore why Washington chose to escalate tariffs, altering established trade relations and intensifying regional geopolitical dynamics.
Why Is the United States Increasing Tariffs on India?
The Trump’s White House justification for the August tariffs measures rests on three his publicly stated pillars.
American Reasons for Increased Tariffs on India
-
Reciprocal Trade Pressure : Tariffs are framed as a corrective tool to address “unfair” trade balances and gain leverage in bilateral negotiations. This follows Executive Order measures on reciprocal tariffs and the broader aim of reducing U.S. goods deficits.
-
National Security Concerns : The U.S. accused India of undermining sanctions on Moscow by importing discounted Russian oil. The extra 25% tariff was presented as a punitive response linked directly to foreign-policy behavior.
-
Domestic Political Pressure : Textile, steel, and other industries, along with political groups, demanded tougher trade measures. Tariffs are positioned as protecting American workers and pushing India toward market concessions. Analysts highlight their selective and politically timed nature.
What are the Indian counter argument against increased tariffs
Following the U.S. imposition of new tariffs in August 2025, India presents several counter arguments against the United States’ decision to raise tariffs.
-
Tariffs as Coercive and Counterproductive : Indian officials argue U.S. tariffs are coercive, stressing that discounted Russian crude imports were driven by energy security and market realities, not geopolitical alignment with Moscow.
-
Bias in the implementation of trade tariffs : India pointed out that there is a bias in the implementation of recent US trade tariffs. For instance, the US has ignored China’s large-scale imports of Russian oil and Europe’s continued purchases of Russian gas, even though both raise the same concerns of sanction circumvention. This selective approach highlights double standards, where strategic partners like the EU are spared while India faces stricter scrutiny,
-
Impact on Workers and Businesses : The Modi government highlights that punitive tariffs hurt ordinary workers, small exporters, and supply-chain industries dependent on the U.S. market.
-
Sectoral Exemptions : India notes that U.S. exemptions for pharmaceuticals and critical sectors prove both nations’ complementarities are vital for global health and technology supply chains.
-
Economic Counter-Measures : India has signaled tax relief, cluster stimulus, and counter-steps to protect exporters while expanding outreach to alternative markets and investors.
In conclusion, India looks for fair trade, lower tariffs, and stronger U.S.-India relations to safeguard growth, global competitiveness, and strategic cooperation.
How Tariffs are Alienating American Allies Globally
U.S. tariffs targeting India, a long-standing security partner, raise doubts among allies about America’s reliability. Many interpret unilateral economic coercion as unpredictability. According to them, if trade can be weaponized against a partner over energy policy, no ally feels safe.
European, East Asian, and Indo-Pacific capitals caution that selective tariffs complicate coalition-building on China, Russia, and supply-chain resilience. Trust, the foundation of alliances, erodes under such economic bullying.
Meanwhile, competitors like Vietnam, Bangladesh, and China benefit, as buyers and multinational firms shift sourcing toward cheaper suppliers free from U.S. duties. As result, it weakens American leverage.
Who can stand for America against China in Asia
If the United States weakens its partnership with India, then the practical question becomes, who else in Asia can credibly balance U.S. interests and contain China ? Some of the potential contenders are as follows:
-
Japan : Strong US treaty ally with advanced military, growing strike capabilities and shared interest in deterring Chinese naval expansion.
-
South Korea : Robust security partnership with the U.S., high-tech defense industry, but economic ties to China complicate full alignment.
-
Phillippines : Geostrategic access, expanding US basing and maritime cooperation, key for South China Sea deterrence.
-
Singapore : Diplomatic hub that hedges wisely, provides logistics and intelligence cooperation while preserving trade ties with China.
-
Thailand : Strategically located hedger that values autonomy; useful for regional diplomacy but reluctant to pick sides decisively.
-
Taiwan : Most immediate frontline with strong self-defense, crucial US partner for deterrence and technology supply chains.
In short, no single state can replicate the strategic weight India brings, with its geographic depth, nuclear deterrent, and proximity to maritime chokepoints.
How BRICS and China gains from America’s tariffs on India
Rather than isolating India, the tariffs risk pushing India closer to alternative partnerships. Practically:
-
BRICS cohesion and diplomatic capital : India’s frustration with U.S. tariffs boosts BRICS’ appeal, portraying the Western-led economic order as coercive. This strengthens BRICS’ leverage in policy alternatives and finance, while India diversifies alignments. As a result, it signals strategic shifts against America’s punitive economic approach.
-
China’s commercial gains : As Indian exporters lose U.S. market share, China gains with cost advantages and scale. Unless buyers prefer Vietnam or Bangladesh, China is well placed to gain from India’s losses. Beijing may also use energy deals, supply chain investments, and easier trade terms to exploit the temporary chill between Washington and New Delhi.
-
Currency and finance dynamics : Strategic hedging may involve more BRICS trade settlements in non-USD mechanisms. Russia and its partner countries could deepen energy and defense ties with India. Collectively, these shifts gradually erode the United States’ exclusive economic leverage.
How Russia gains from America’s tariffs on India?
When two giants clash, a third often reaps the rewards. The ongoing U.S.-India trade battle is no exception. Russia finds itself in a sweet spot, turning tensions into opportunities. From energy exports to defense deals, Moscow is quietly gaining massive advantages. But how exactly is Russia capitalizing on this trade rift? Let’s dive in.
-
Stronger Energy Ties : With U.S. tariffs disrupting Indian trade, Russia can expand oil, gas, and coal exports to India at competitive rates.
-
Defense Cooperation Boost : India may deepen its reliance on Russian defense technology and arms deals, reducing dependency on U.S. suppliers.
-
Alternative Trade Settlements : Both nations can increase rupee-ruble transactions, bypassing the U.S. dollar and enhancing financial autonomy.
-
Market Diversification : Russian companies gain a bigger foothold in India’s fertilizer, steel, and energy markets.
-
Strategic Partnership : Weakened U.S.-India ties give Moscow room to strengthen geopolitical influence in South Asia.
Pro and Cons of punitive tariffs on India
Punitive tariffs by the United States on India aim to protect U.S. industries but risk trade tensions, economic slowdown, and strained geopolitical relations.
In conclusion, punitive tariffs on India may offer short-term domestic benefits to the United States, but in the long term, they risk higher costs, trade retaliation, and weakened strategic partnerships.
What America loses by losing India as an ally?
If sustained alienation produces a meaningful cooling in U.S.–India ties, American strategic losses are tangible:
-
Reduced regional balance vs. China : India provides geographic and military counterweight in Asia. A less aligned India diminishes the deterrent capacity of the Quad and allied coordination on maritime security.
-
Weakened supply-chain resilience : India was being courted for manufacturing diversification away from China. Damaged ties mean the U.S. loses a large, democratic alternative for onshoring or nearshoring high-volume manufacturing.
-
Intelligence and defence cooperation frictions : Long-running collaboration on intelligence sharing, exercises, and defence procurement depends on mutual trust. However, economic coercion erodes that trust and may limit cooperation on critical security issues.
-
Economic opportunity costs : U.S. firms lose preferential access to an expanding market and talent pool, while competitors (European, East Asian, Chinese firms) are poised to gain.
What long-term consequences could America face due to high tariffs on India?
High tariffs on India risk long-term harm to America. They raise consumer prices, disrupt supply chains, slow economic growth, and weaken U.S. firms’ competitiveness. Diplomatic trust and strategic partnership may erode, pushing India toward other powers and reducing U.S. influence in Asia.
Investment and job losses could follow as businesses relocate to friendlier markets. Uncertainty also undermines multilateral cooperation. A U.S. federal appeals court recently ruled that most of Trump’s tariffs were illegal under existing emergency powers and harmed U.S. consumers.
Web Resources on the Trump’s Tariffs on India
1. Imf.org: GDP of the Countries
2. Globalfirepower.com: Defense Spending Budget
3. Globalfirepower.com: Military Strength of Asian Countries
4. Unctad.org: General profile of United States
5. Sipri.org: Unprecedented rise in global military expenditure
6. The Role of Trade and Tariffs in Economic Policy
Final Words
In the long run, America’s high tariffs on India risk damaging its own economic growth, raising consumer costs, and weakening global competitiveness. By straining a key strategic partnership, the U.S. inadvertently strengthens China, Russia, and BRICS influence in Asia. Sustained trade friction may erode trust, reduce supply-chain resilience, and diminish America’s ability to shape global trade and security outcomes effectively. Please share your thoughts below in the comment section and help us to make this article better. Thank you for reading!
Questions and answers related to Trump’s Trade Tariffs on India:
As of late August 2025, the U.S. has imposed a total 50 percent tariff on most Indian exports. A combination of a 25 percent “reciprocal” duty and an additional 25 percent punitive rate tied to India’s purchase of Russian oil. Sectors like textiles, gems, chemicals, and leather are heavily affected, while pharmaceuticals and electronics remain exempt.
By sharply increasing tariffs on Indian imports, the U.S. raises costs for American businesses dependent on labor-intensive Indian goods such as apparel and gems. On which consumers face higher prices and reduced product variety. Furthermore, supply disruptions may push U.S. firms to source alternatives from costlier or less established markets.
Indeed, the harsh U.S. tariff escalation is nudging India closer to strategic alignment with China. Diplomatically, both nations now emphasize being “development partners” amid rising Western pressure, signaling a pragmatic realignment of geopolitical interests. This convergence, though cautious, may reinforce Asia-centric blocs.
U.S. tariffs, perceived as punitive and unilateral, are prompting India to deepen ties with BRICS partners (China and Russia), thereby reinforcing alternative economic networks. This shift weakens U.S. soft power and strategic influence in the region, as India seeks stability and diversified alliances amid growing economic coercion.
Trump’s 50% tariffs cripple cost-sensitive U.S. businesses that rely on Indian inputs such as apparel manufacturers and jewelry retailers forcing them to pay significantly more or shift supply chains. Consequently, consumer prices rise, and companies face operational uncertainty in a globalized marketplace disrupted by tariff-induced distortions.
Critics argue that imposing 50 percent tariffs on India constitutes a strategic disaster by eroding trust and undermining decades of bipartisan diplomacy. The policy risks alienating a vital ally, reducing America’s influence in Asia, and inadvertently pushing India toward alternative powers like China and Russia.
By slapping a punitive 50 percent tariff on key Indian goods, U.S. supply chains, especially those reliant on Indian textiles, gems, pharmaceuticals, and auto components face major disruptions. As a result, costs rise, lead times extend, and businesses scramble to secure alternate suppliers, reducing economic resilience and flexibility. (Trade-policy expert)
Economically, the tariffs threaten Indian exporters and raise costs for U.S. consumers. Geopolitically, they strain the strategic partnership, disrupt Quad alignment, and incentivize India to diversify ties with China and Russia, weakening American influence in the Indo-Pacific balance.
At the 2025 SCO summit in Tianjin, Modi and Xi reaffirmed that India and China are “partners, not rivals,” committed to maintaining peace along the border, addressed India’s substantial trade deficit, agreed on counter-terrorism cooperation, and Modi invited Xi to the 2026 BRICS Summit, signalling a pragmatic reset.
Amid escalating U.S. tariffs on Indian exports, Modi’s conciliatory yet assertive engagement with Xi at the SCO conveys India’s strategic autonomy and diplomatic agility. This meeting underscores India’s intent to diversify alliances and resist pressure, reinforcing its role in a multipolar Asia.