Who Pays for the U.S. Tariffs? American Consumers, Firms or Foreign Governments?
Overview
When President Donald Trump signed an executive order doubling tariffs on Indian goods to 50% in August 2025, the move sent shockwaves through global markets. The stated rationale was punitive, targeting India’s continued purchase of Russian oil, but the economic consequences are far-reaching and complex.
While the political narrative frames tariffs as a tool to discipline foreign governments, the economic reality is more sobering. The burden falls squarely on American consumers and firms. This article by Academic Block unpacks the real cost of tariffs, drawing on recent data and expert analysis to answer a deceptively simple question: Who Pays for the U.S. Tariffs?
What Recent Studies Reveal About U.S. Tariff Effects
A wave of recent economic research underscores a hard truth: Americans are footing the bill for U.S. tariffs, particularly those enacted since 2018. The findings consistently show that whether businesses or consumers pay first, the costs eventually trickle down to both, suppressing wages, raising prices, and eroding household income. According to some experts:
-
Penn Wharton Budget Model : Estimates suggest recent tariff policies could shrink U.S. GDP by 6% and reduce wages by 5% over the long term. Importantly, the analysis found little difference in economic pain whether businesses or consumers initially absorbed the tariffs, both ultimately suffered.
-
Yale Budget Lab : An August 2025 study concluded that tariffs have driven the average effective tariff rate to its highest level since 1933. The short-run price increase equates to an average income loss of $2,400 per U.S. household, hitting lower-income households hardest due to the regressive nature of tariffs.
-
Tax Foundation : In its August 2025 analysis, the organization found that current tariffs function as an average tax increase of over $1,300 per household in 2025, with significant harm to downstream industries reliant on imported materials.
-
Center for American Progress : This analysis estimates that tariffs could cost American households an average of $5,200 annually, driving up prices for essential goods, including vehicles, electronics, and food.
Economic Impact of Recent U.S. Tariffs
American Consumers, Firms or Foreign Governments: Who is paying for U.S. Tariffs
Back in 2019, during a Trump campaign rally, he told the audience, “You’re not paying for those tariffs. China’s paying for those tariffs.” A similar statement came in 2025, when Trump declared, “Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.” Other tariff supporters have also claimed that foreign countries would bear the cost of tariffs.
However, experts take a different view. According to them, it is American consumers who ultimately foot the bill for tariffs. Here’s an example: If Target had to pay a $5 tariff to import a pair of jeans they normally sell for $10, they would raise the price to $15. Ultimately, the American customer would be the one paying the extra $5 caused by the tariff.
Moreover, recent market analysis reveals a sharp shift over time. In June, firms bore 64%, consumers 22%, and foreign exporters 14% of the burden. By October, that burden is expected to flip, with consumers paying around 67%. A dynamic picture emerges from a recent analysis by Goldman Sachs (August 2025):
Key Impacts of Tariffs on U.S. Consumers
U.S. tariffs in 2025 reshaped everyday economics, driving up prices, disrupting imports, pressuring households, straining healthcare costs, and unsettling consumer access across key goods and industries nationwide.
-
Higher Consumer Prices & Cost Pressure : U.S. tariffs across 2025 have raised short-term consumer prices by approximately 2.3%, equating to an average loss in purchasing power of about $3,800 per household.
-
Inflation on Key Goods : Apparel costs surged up to 17%, while food and fresh produce rose by 2.8% and 4.0%, respectively.
-
Annual Household Cost Bump : Recent measures are projected to tack on around $2,400 annually to U.S. household expenses.
-
De Minimis Exemption Removal : The end of duty-free imports for items valued below $800 has triggered shipping disruptions, higher costs, and reduced access to international goods, particularly affecting hobbyists and small businesses.
-
Pharmaceutical Price Risk : Proposed tariffs on imported drugs, potentially as high as 200%. It could lead to higher medicine costs, shortages, and access issues for low-income and elderly consumers.
So far, the evidence is clear: American consumers ultimately pay the price for U.S. tariffs. But a critical question remains: Will these tariffs also slow the growth of the U.S. economy and impact GDP? Let’s find out.
Impact of Tariffs on U.S. GDP Growth: Slowing the American Economy?
Recent studies and analyst forecasts show that U.S. tariffs, especially those enacted in 2025 and later, are weighing on economic growth. As a result, they can flatten GDP, reduce output, and narrow the country’s economic potential.
Real GDP growth is projected to be 0.9 percentage points lower in 2025 because of tariffs and retaliatory actions. In the long run, the economy could be 0.6% smaller, equivalent to about $160 billion in annual output.
The OECD now expects U.S. growth to slow from 2.8% in 2024 to 1.6% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026. It point out to higher trade costs, uncertainty from tariffs, and ongoing supply chain problems as the main reasons.
The Fed estimates that broad-based U.S. tariff increases could reduce global GDP by 0.8%, with the U.S. among the largest economic losers.
Research estimates a 1.6% long-run reduction in GDP, stemming from a 10% uniform tariff increase (1.1%) plus additional layered effects.
What This Means for the U.S. Economy
-
Economic slowdown : Models suggest tariffs cut GDP growth by anywhere from a few tenths of a percentage point to several percentage points. That is enough to push growth from its historical 2-3% range down into about 1-2%.
-
Long-term structural harm : Forecasts from Yale warn of a permanently smaller economy, translating into lower output, weaker investment, and rising unemployment.
-
Macroeconomic turbulence : OECD and Fed projections show that tariffs increase uncertainty, depress investment, and weaken supply-chain reliability. Those effects unsettle both markets and economic policy.
Didn’t Trump Impose Tariffs During His First Term?
Yes, President Trump did indeed impose significant tariffs during his first term. Beginning in early 2018, his administration implemented 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum citing national security under Section 232.
He also levied hefty duties (30-50%) on solar panels and washing machines, and launched a sweeping trade war with China by targeting hundreds of billions in imports. These protectionist measures sparked global retaliation, reshaped trade dynamics, and left a lasting mark on U.S. economic policy.
History of Tariffs in last 100 years and its outcomes
The question of who really pays for U.S. tariffs can’t be answered without first exploring how earlier policies have rippled through economies over time. Over the past century, tariffs have alternately sparked growth and caution, serving as both a shield for budding industries and a catalyst for economic friction.
By protecting infant industries, generating government revenue, and enhancing national security, tariffs have occasionally driven structural strength. Yet, when misapplied, they’ve led to higher prices, trade wars, and global disruption.
It can be seen from the above table that tariffs exemplify a double-edged approach. They can catalyze domestic growth, when targeted at strategic or emerging industries, but often at the cost of inflation, global retaliation, and reduced efficiency. Historical records show the importance of precision, context, and strategic design when wielding tariffs. Done thoughtfully, they offer protection and leverage; done recklessly, they can fracture trade and stall economies.
Web Resources on who pays for the U.S. tariffs
1. Goldmansachs.com: Impact of Trump’s tariffs on U.S. economy
2. Budgetlab.yale.edu: State of U.S. Tariffs
3. Taxfoundation.org: Trump Tariffs Trade War
4. Federalreserve.gov: Trade-offs of Higher U.S. Tariffs:- GDP, Revenues, and the Trade Deficit
5. The Role of Trade and Tariffs in Economic Policy
Final Words
Regardless of the political promises, the data is clear. U.S. tariffs often backfire, shifting costs to American consumers and businesses while straining global trade. While policymakers present tariffs as leverage to discipline foreign governments, the real burden lowers household income, raises prices, and slows economic growth.
History shows tariffs can protect industries, but at a steep cost when misused. For a stable economy, the U.S. must balance trade strategy with economic resilience, ensuring policies protect workers without undermining growth, innovation, and consumer purchasing power. Please share your thoughts below in the comment section and help us to make this article better. Thank you for reading!
Questions and answers related to who pays for U.S tariffs:
Empirical data confirms that U.S. tariffs function as a regressive consumption tax. While importers technically pay duties at the border, most tariff costs often 70% or more are passed onto American businesses and ultimately consumers, especially in lower-income households. Tariff revenue does benefit government coffers, but the economic burden predominantly lands on U.S. stakeholders.
Yes, consumers and businesses are absorbing the brunt of recent tariff pressures. Higher effective rates (up to ~18%) have elevated prices across sectors, eroded purchasing power (roughly $2,400 annually per household), and slowed GDP growth, indicating U.S. households endure both direct and indirect costs.
Tariffs are remitted by U.S. importers at customs and become federal revenue, though they represent only around 1.8% of total federal receipts in 2025. Most of the actual cost is borne by businesses and passed on to consumers. Thus, while the government collects revenue, Americans ultimately foot the bill.
In 2025, extensive tariffs have sharply raised consumer costs. Shoe prices surged ~39%, apparel ~37%; food and produce rose 3–7% initially. Households see real income losses averaging $2,100–$2,400 annually and face fewer affordable import options due to supply disruptions.
The evidence is clear: U.S. consumers, not foreign countries, absorb the majority of tariff costs. Although tariffs are legally levied on importers, limited price adjustments by exporters force U.S. businesses and consumers to shoulder higher costs with only marginal price concessions from abroad.
In practice, foreign governments might encourage exporters to absorb costs, but the effect is limited. Analysts report only mild price reductions and importers still largely absorb duties, passing on costs internally rather than shifting burden onto export pricing.
While some foreign exporters may slim margins to retain competitiveness, analysis indicates such efforts are modest. Banks report importers in the U.S. largely continue absorbing tariff burdens with little offset in export prices.
Estimates vary. Goldman Sachs suggests ~70% of tariff costs are passed to consumers. Other analyses show importers initially absorb costs, delaying price increases but the eventual consumer share remains substantial.
Ultimately, both: the U.S. government collects tariff revenue, but the tax burden falls on consumers. Data shows tariff revenue makes up a small share of federal income, while households and businesses bear most of the economic impact through elevated prices.