Multilateralism vs. Unilateralism: Debates in Global Governance

Overview
The global stage today is defined by a complex interplay of national interests, power dynamics, and international norms. Among the primary forces shaping international relations are multilateralism and unilateralism. These two distinct approaches to diplomacy and decision-making have far-reaching consequences for global governance, security, trade, and the environment. The debate between multilateralism and unilateralism has long been a central issue in international relations theory and practice, shaping how states interact with one another, address global challenges, and navigate conflicts of interest. This article by Academic Block seeks to provide a thorough examination of multilateralism and unilateralism, exploring their definitions, historical development, advantages, disadvantages, and their respective impacts on global diplomacy. By understanding the nuances of these approaches, we can better appreciate the broader implications for international cooperation, the evolving role of international institutions, and the changing nature of state sovereignty in an increasingly interconnected world.
Defining Multilateralism and Unilateralism
Multilateralism and unilateralism, although related, are often framed as opposing concepts in international relations.
Multilateralism refers to an approach to diplomacy and international cooperation that involves multiple countries working together toward common goals. It emphasizes shared decision-making, consensus-building, and collective action. Multilateralism is most often associated with international organizations, treaties, and agreements that require the participation of many states. The United Nations (UN), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the Paris Agreement on climate change are prime examples of multilateral frameworks. Multilateralism is often viewed as a mechanism for managing global challenges that transcend national borders, such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics, and for promoting peace and stability through collaboration.
In contrast, unilateralism involves a single state acting independently to pursue its own interests, often without regard to the interests or opinions of other countries. Unilateral actions are typically characterized by a country making decisions and taking actions on its own, bypassing international norms, agreements, and institutions. Unilateralism can be seen in foreign policy actions such as military interventions, trade policies, or sanctions imposed by a single country without broader international support. While unilateralism is sometimes perceived as a pragmatic response to global challenges, it is often criticized for undermining international cooperation and stability.
The Evolution of Multilateralism and Unilateralism
The roots of multilateralism and unilateralism can be traced back to the early history of international relations, though their prominence grew in different historical contexts.
Multilateralism gained significant traction in the aftermath of World War II, with the creation of the United Nations and other international institutions designed to prevent future conflicts and foster global cooperation. The United States, in particular, played a central role in establishing multilateral frameworks, seeing the benefits of working with other nations to maintain global peace and stability. The establishment of the Bretton Woods institutions in 1944, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, further entrenched the idea of multilateral cooperation in economic governance. These institutions were conceived as a means to rebuild war-torn economies, prevent another Great Depression, and create a more cooperative global order.
During the Cold War, multilateralism was crucial in managing tensions between the superpowers. The formation of NATO, the Warsaw Pact, and various arms control agreements represented efforts by countries to cooperate through multilateral platforms while also competing for influence and security. However, the bipolar nature of the Cold War also gave rise to unilateral actions, particularly by the United States and the Soviet Union, as each superpower pursued its own interests in a highly polarized global environment.
Unilateralism, on the other hand, has always been a recurring feature of international relations, though its prominence has varied across different historical periods. In the 19th century, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny in the United States and the concept of imperialism in European powers reflected the unilateral exercise of national interests. The 20th century witnessed the rise of unilateralism during specific geopolitical moments, such as the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 or the United States' decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change in 2017. These actions were often driven by a desire to protect national sovereignty or advance a country's perceived strategic interests, even when other countries opposed such actions.
The Case for Multilateralism
Multilateralism has long been championed as a desirable approach to global governance for several reasons. Proponents argue that multilateral frameworks help to create a sense of global solidarity, reduce the risk of conflict, and ensure that all voices are heard in decision-making processes.
-
Collective Action on Global Challenges : Multilateralism is particularly effective in addressing global challenges that transcend national borders. Climate change, for example, is an issue that requires cooperation among all nations, as its effects are felt universally. Multilateral agreements, such as the Paris Agreement on climate change, allow countries to collaborate on reducing carbon emissions, sharing technology, and developing adaptation strategies. Similarly, multilateralism is essential in the fight against pandemics, where coordinated global responses are necessary to contain the spread of disease and ensure equitable distribution of vaccines and medical resources.
-
Promoting Peace and Security : Multilateral institutions, particularly the United Nations, have played a key role in maintaining peace and security. The UN Security Council, through its peacekeeping missions and diplomatic efforts, has been instrumental in preventing conflicts and mitigating the impacts of war. Multilateral diplomacy allows for the pooling of resources and expertise, ensuring that peacekeeping operations are more effective and that conflict resolution efforts are more comprehensive. Furthermore, multilateralism helps to reduce the likelihood of war by providing mechanisms for dialogue and negotiation.
-
Enhancing Trade and Economic Cooperation : In the realm of trade, multilateralism facilitates the establishment of rules-based systems that ensure fair competition and dispute resolution. The World Trade Organization (WTO), for example, plays a central role in regulating international trade by promoting free trade while ensuring that trade practices remain fair and transparent. Multilateral trade agreements allow countries to benefit from economies of scale, reduce trade barriers, and access new markets. These frameworks also help to address trade imbalances and provide a platform for resolving disputes in a peaceful manner.
-
Upholding International Law and Human Rights : Multilateralism strengthens international law by fostering cooperation on issues such as human rights, humanitarian law, and environmental protection. Treaties and conventions like the Geneva Conventions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have been the product of multilateral negotiations, establishing global norms that govern state behavior. These frameworks help ensure that countries are held accountable for their actions and that vulnerable populations receive protection from violations of their rights.
The Case for Unilateralism
While multilateralism has its merits, unilateralism is often presented as a necessary and sometimes more efficient alternative in certain circumstances. Advocates of unilateralism argue that it allows states to protect their national interests and respond more quickly to emerging threats.
-
National Sovereignty and Autonomy : Unilateralism is often seen as a means for states to preserve their sovereignty and autonomy. When a state perceives a threat to its national interests or security, unilateral action may be viewed as the most direct and effective response. This approach emphasizes the right of nations to make decisions that serve their own needs, free from external constraints imposed by multilateral agreements or international bodies. For example, a country may decide to impose tariffs, sanction another state, or undertake military action without seeking approval from multilateral organizations such as the UN.
-
Efficiency and Expediency : Unilateralism allows states to act quickly and decisively without waiting for consensus from other countries. In times of crisis, where immediate action is required, multilateral negotiations can be slow and cumbersome. A unilateral response can be more agile, especially when a state faces an immediate security threat or economic challenge. The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, for instance, was based on the belief that immediate military action was necessary to eliminate a perceived threat, despite the lack of broad international support.
-
Protecting National Interests : In a world where global power dynamics are constantly shifting, unilateralism can be used to protect a country's strategic interests. States may resort to unilateral actions in the pursuit of self-interest when they feel that multilateral agreements compromise their national priorities. For instance, the United States' decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement in 2017 was based on the belief that the agreement was detrimental to its economic growth and energy independence.
-
Challenging International Institutions : Unilateralism can also be seen as a means of challenging international institutions and norms that are perceived as ineffective or biased. Some countries may argue that multilateral organizations, such as the UN or the WTO, disproportionately favor certain countries or fail to address key issues in a timely manner. Unilateral action, in this view, is a way to bypass institutions that are perceived as too slow, too bureaucratic, or too compromised to effectively serve the interests of all nations.
Multilateralism Case Studies
-
Paris Climate Agreement (2015) : The Paris Agreement is a multilateral framework in which nearly 200 countries agreed to take action against climate change by limiting global temperature rise. It marked a significant example of multilateral cooperation aimed at achieving a common goal. It demonstrates the benefits of multilateral negotiations in addressing global challenges, with countries committing to nationally determined contributions (NDCs).
-
World Trade Organization (WTO) and Doha Development Round (2001-Present) : The WTO was created as a platform for multilateral trade negotiations. The Doha Development Round was an attempt to reform international trade by addressing the needs of developing nations. While the Doha Round has faced challenges and has yet to reach a final agreement, it highlights how multilateral organizations aim to foster economic cooperation and tackle global economic issues.
-
United Nations Peacekeeping Operations : The UN has engaged in various peacekeeping missions in regions such as Rwanda, Bosnia, and Congo to maintain peace and security through multilateral cooperation. UN peacekeeping operations reflect multilateral efforts to ensure international peace, despite challenges in coordination and mandate enforcement.
Unilateralism Case Studies
-
United States' 2003 Invasion of Iraq : The U.S., under President George W. Bush, launched the invasion of Iraq without broad international support, citing the threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). This act of unilateralism resulted in widespread international controversy, the destabilization of Iraq, and long-term geopolitical consequences, including the rise of ISIS. The lack of UN approval and widespread opposition showcased the risks of unilateral action in foreign policy.
-
Brexit (2016) : The United Kingdom's decision to leave the European Union (EU) in a referendum reflected unilateral action, as it was a sovereign decision, despite the EU's multilateral framework. The Brexit decision led to economic, political, and social consequences, showing the complexities of unilateral action in a highly integrated international system. It also illustrated the tension between national sovereignty and multilateral commitments.
-
U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement (2017) : President Donald Trump’s decision to unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement was a key example of unilateralism in addressing global climate change. While the withdrawal had significant diplomatic implications, it also spurred international reactions, including other countries reinforcing their commitments to the Agreement.
The Interplay Between Multilateralism and Unilateralism
While multilateralism and unilateralism are often seen as opposing approaches, in practice, they often interact and complement one another. States may engage in both multilateral and unilateral actions depending on the situation. For instance, a country may participate in multilateral negotiations to address global challenges while simultaneously taking unilateral actions to advance its own national interests. The United States, under different administrations, has oscillated between multilateralism and unilateralism, depending on the issue at hand.
Moreover, the tension between multilateralism and unilateralism often plays out in international forums. Some countries may push for a more multilateral approach to global governance, while others argue for unilateral action as a means of preserving national sovereignty. The debate between these approaches is an ongoing one, with shifting dynamics reflecting changing geopolitical realities and national priorities.
The Future of Multilateralism and Unilateralism
As global dynamics shift in the 21st century, both multilateralism and unilateralism are evolving, and their future roles in international relations are intertwined. Multilateralism, though facing challenges, is likely to remain vital for addressing global issues such as climate change, public health, and trade. The reform of international institutions and the emergence of regional and issue-specific coalitions could make multilateralism more inclusive and responsive. Climate change will particularly drive cooperation, requiring stronger and more integrated multilateral efforts.
However, unilateralism is unlikely to disappear. As states prioritize their national interests, particularly in technology, security, and economic matters, unilateral actions may become more common. This trend could escalate, especially as countries seek technological sovereignty and protect national interests in cybersecurity, AI, and digital trade. Unilateralism might also manifest in trade policies, sanctions, and military actions, often as a response to rising geopolitical tensions or economic pressures.
The future could see a hybrid approach, where countries engage in both multilateral cooperation and unilateral actions based on specific national priorities. For instance, while working within international frameworks on climate or trade, states may pursue unilateral measures in areas like security and technology. The balance between these two approaches will define global diplomacy, with both forms playing critical roles depending on the situation.
Ultimately, multilateralism and unilateralism will not be mutually exclusive. As global challenges require coordinated efforts, but national interests remain paramount, the future of international relations will hinge on finding pragmatic solutions that blend both cooperation and self-interest. This balance will ensure that global diplomacy remains effective in an increasingly interconnected and competitive world.
Final Words
In conclusion, the debate between multilateralism and unilateralism remains a central issue in contemporary global diplomacy. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and the effectiveness of each depends on the specific context and goals of the countries involved. Multilateralism offers the potential for collective action, peace, and security, while unilateralism allows for greater efficiency and autonomy in decision-making. The future of global governance will likely involve a balance between these two approaches, as states continue to navigate the complexities of an increasingly interconnected and multipolar world. Understanding the dynamics of multilateralism and unilateralism is crucial for policymakers, diplomats, and scholars alike as they seek to shape the direction of international relations in the 21st century. We hope this article by the Academic Block has helped deepen your understanding of the role economic sanctions play in global diplomacy. If you have any queries or questions, we'd love to hear from you. Thank you for reading!
This Article will answer your questions like:
Multilateralism is often seen as better than unilateralism because it fosters international cooperation and collective problem-solving. By involving multiple countries, multilateralism encourages diverse perspectives and shared responsibility, leading to more sustainable and equitable solutions to global challenges. It also enhances legitimacy and accountability, as agreements reflect a consensus rather than the interests of a single nation. Furthermore, multilateral frameworks provide mechanisms for dispute resolution, promote stability, and create a sense of community among nations, thereby strengthening global governance and reducing tensions in international relations.
The key difference between unilateralism and multilateralism lies in the approach to international relations and decision-making. Unilateralism involves a single country acting independently to pursue its interests, often without the consent or participation of other nations. In contrast, multilateralism emphasizes collaboration among multiple countries, fostering collective decision-making and shared responsibility for global issues. While unilateral actions may yield quick results for the acting country, they can lead to tensions and isolation. Multilateralism, on the other hand, promotes dialogue, consensus-building, and the establishment of international norms and agreements that benefit all participating nations.
Multilateralism offers several advantages over unilateralism, including enhanced legitimacy, cooperation, and comprehensive solutions. By involving multiple nations, multilateral agreements reflect a broader consensus, making them more acceptable and stable. This approach encourages shared responsibility, reducing the burden on individual countries. Additionally, multilateralism fosters collaboration on complex global issues, such as climate change and trade, leading to more effective and sustainable solutions. It also provides frameworks for dialogue, conflict resolution, and the establishment of norms, promoting peace and security in international relations while enabling countries to leverage collective resources and expertise.
An example of multilateralism is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), established in 1992. The UNFCCC brings together nearly all countries in the world to address climate change through collaborative efforts. It serves as a platform for nations to negotiate agreements and set binding targets, such as the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming. Through regular conferences, known as Conferences of the Parties (COP), member states share knowledge, resources, and best practices to collectively tackle climate-related challenges, illustrating how multilateralism facilitates global cooperation on pressing issues.
Since 2000, the United Nations has actively promoted multilateralism through various initiatives and frameworks aimed at addressing global challenges. Key efforts include the establishment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2000 and the subsequent Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, which encourage collective action toward sustainable development. The UN has facilitated international conferences and summits to foster dialogue on issues such as climate change, security, and human rights. Additionally, the UN’s peacekeeping missions exemplify multilateral cooperation in maintaining international peace and security, demonstrating the organization's commitment to collaborative solutions in a complex world.
Examples of unilateral actions by the United States in the 21st century include the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which was conducted without broad international support or UN approval. The U.S. also withdrew from the Paris Agreement in 2017, citing economic concerns, despite global consensus on the need to combat climate change. Additionally, the imposition of tariffs on various countries during the trade war initiated in 2018 exemplifies unilateral trade actions. These instances highlight the U.S. approach to prioritizing national interests, often leading to strained relations with allies and challenges in achieving collective global goals.
Unilateralism can significantly impact global trade agreements by undermining established frameworks and fostering trade tensions. When a country opts for unilateral measures, such as imposing tariffs or sanctions, it can disrupt existing trade relationships and lead to retaliatory actions from affected nations. This approach may create uncertainty in global markets and hinder cooperative efforts to address issues like trade imbalances or intellectual property rights. Additionally, unilateralism often prioritizes national interests over collaborative solutions, limiting the potential for comprehensive agreements that benefit multiple countries, thereby complicating the global trade landscape and reducing trust among trading partners.
Some countries prefer bilateral agreements over multilateral ones for several reasons. Bilateral agreements allow for tailored arrangements that address specific needs and interests of the two nations involved, enabling more flexibility and quicker negotiations. Countries may find it easier to reach consensus and establish trust in smaller groups, reducing complexities associated with multilateral negotiations. Additionally, bilateral agreements can provide immediate economic or strategic benefits without the delays often inherent in multilateral discussions. Lastly, nations may pursue bilateral agreements to strengthen alliances or partnerships, especially when facing global challenges or competition.
Achieving consensus in multilateral organizations presents several challenges, including differing national interests, varying levels of economic development, and political ideologies. The diversity of member states often leads to conflicting priorities, making it difficult to reach agreements that satisfy all parties. Bureaucratic processes and lengthy negotiations can hinder timely decision-making, especially in urgent situations. Additionally, power dynamics among nations can create imbalances, where more influential countries dominate discussions, potentially marginalizing smaller nations. These challenges necessitate effective diplomacy, skilled negotiation, and innovative approaches to build consensus and foster cooperation within multilateral frameworks.
Global climate policy has been significantly shaped by the tension between multilateral and unilateral approaches. Multilateral efforts, such as the Paris Agreement, aim to create a cooperative framework for nations to collectively address climate change, promoting shared commitments and accountability. However, unilateral actions, such as the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, can undermine these efforts, disrupting global momentum and creating uncertainty. The divergence between these approaches can hinder progress, as unilateralism may prioritize national interests over global responsibilities, whereas multilateralism fosters collaboration and collective action, which are essential for effective climate policy and sustainable solutions.
Determining whether unilateralism or multilateralism is a better approach depends on the context and specific goals involved. Multilateralism is generally preferred for addressing complex global issues, as it fosters cooperation, shared responsibility, and comprehensive solutions. It enhances legitimacy and stability by incorporating diverse perspectives. However, unilateralism may be necessary in certain situations where swift action is required or national interests are at stake.
Controversies Associated with Multilateralism vs. Unilateralism
Iraq War (2003):
-
- Multilateralism: Many countries, including key allies, opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, arguing for UN authorization and multilateral consensus.
- Unilateralism: The George W. Bush administration pursued military action without UN Security Council approval, citing national security imperatives and the doctrine of preemptive self-defense.
Climate Change Policies:
-
- Multilateralism: Efforts like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement aimed to coordinate global action on climate change through multilateral negotiations and commitments.
- Unilateralism: Withdrawals from international climate agreements, such as the U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement in 2017, highlighted unilateral actions undermining global climate efforts.
Trade Wars and Tariffs:
-
- Multilateralism: The World Trade Organization (WTO) provides a platform for resolving trade disputes and setting global trade rules through multilateral negotiations.
- Unilateralism: Tariffs imposed unilaterally, such as those by the U.S. under the Trump administration, sparked trade tensions and raised concerns about protectionism undermining free trade principles.
United Nations Interventions:
-
- Multilateralism: UN Security Council resolutions authorize peacekeeping missions and international interventions, aiming to maintain peace and security through collective action.
- Unilateralism: Instances of unilateral military interventions, such as NATO’s actions in Kosovo without UNSC approval, raised debates about the legality and legitimacy of unilateral military actions.
North Korea Nuclear Crisis:
-
- Multilateralism: Efforts like the Six-Party Talks involving regional powers sought to negotiate North Korea’s denuclearization through multilateral diplomacy.
- Unilateralism: Unilateral sanctions and threats of military action by individual countries, particularly the U.S., created tensions and complicated efforts for a unified approach to the North Korean nuclear issue.
Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA):
-
- Multilateralism: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) involved multiple countries negotiating to curb Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
- Unilateralism: The U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018 and subsequent reimposition of unilateral sanctions on Iran strained relations with European allies and undermined the agreement’s effectiveness.
Brexit and EU Relations:
-
- Multilateralism: The European Union operates on principles of multilateral cooperation, with Brexit highlighting debates over sovereignty versus collective EU decision-making.
- Unilateralism: The UK’s decision to leave the EU raised concerns about unilateral national decisions impacting broader multilateral frameworks, including trade and security cooperation.
Human Rights and International Law:
-
- Multilateralism: International human rights treaties and conventions, supported by multilateral cooperation, aim to establish global norms and standards.
- Unilateralism: Controversies arise when countries reject international human rights obligations or adopt unilateral policies that conflict with established norms, such as refugee policies and use of force in conflict zones.
Global Health Crises:
-
- Multilateralism: Organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) coordinate international responses to health crises, promoting global health security and cooperation.
- Unilateralism: Responses to pandemics, such as COVID-19, varied widely with some countries implementing unilateral travel bans and vaccine hoarding, challenging global solidarity and coordinated responses.
UN Funding and Reform:
-
- Multilateralism: UN funding mechanisms rely on contributions from member states based on agreed-upon formulas, supporting peacekeeping, development, and humanitarian efforts.
- Unilateralism: Calls for unilateral funding cuts or reforms by major contributors like the U.S. raised debates about the impact on UN operations, mandates, and its ability to fulfill global responsibilities effectively.
Facts on Multilateralism vs. Unilateralism
Multilateralism:
- International Agreements: Multilateralism involves cooperative efforts among multiple countries to address global challenges such as climate change, trade, and security through treaties and international organizations like the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- Global Initiatives: Initiatives like the Paris Agreement on climate change, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and various arms control treaties (e.g., New START) exemplify multilateral efforts to achieve common goals through collective action and shared responsibilities.
- Legal Framework: Multilateralism operates within a framework of international law and norms, aiming to establish rules-based order and promote peaceful conflict resolution through institutions like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and international arbitration.
- Trade and Economic Cooperation: Multilateral trade agreements, such as those negotiated under the WTO, facilitate global trade by reducing tariffs, ensuring fair competition, and resolving trade disputes through multilateral dispute settlement mechanisms.
- Global Health and Humanitarian Assistance: Multilateral organizations like the WHO and UNICEF coordinate international responses to health crises, natural disasters, and humanitarian emergencies, pooling resources and expertise for effective global assistance.
Unilateralism:
- National Sovereignty: Unilateralism prioritizes national interests and autonomy, allowing countries to pursue policies, decisions, and actions independently without seeking consensus or approval from other nations or international organizations.
- Military Interventions: Unilateral military actions, such as the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, NATO interventions in Kosovo, and airstrikes against terrorist targets in sovereign states, illustrate unilateral approaches to addressing perceived threats and security challenges.
- Trade Policies: Unilateral trade actions, including tariffs imposed to protect domestic industries or address trade imbalances, can lead to trade wars and strained international economic relations, as seen in recent U.S.-China trade disputes.
- Withdrawal from International Agreements: Unilateral decisions to withdraw from international agreements, such as the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change in 2017 and the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) in 2018, can undermine global cooperation efforts and trust among nations.
- National Security and Immigration: Unilateral policies on border security, immigration controls, and refugee admissions reflect national sovereignty concerns and domestic political priorities, influencing global perceptions and responses to humanitarian crises.
Comparative Impact:
- Effectiveness and Efficiency: Multilateral approaches often emphasize consensus-building and collective problem-solving, aiming for broader global impact and legitimacy, while unilateral actions can achieve faster results but risk isolation and criticism.
- Global Governance: The balance between multilateralism and unilateralism shapes global governance structures, influencing the effectiveness of international institutions, adherence to international law, and the ability to address transnational challenges comprehensively.
- Public Opinion and Diplomatic Relations: Unilateral actions can strain diplomatic relations and international cooperation, affecting alliances, trade partnerships, and perceptions of global leadership, while multilateral efforts often garner broader support and legitimacy.
- Emerging Challenges: Emerging global challenges such as cybersecurity, pandemic preparedness, and artificial intelligence governance require nuanced approaches that balance national interests with collective global solutions, testing the efficacy of both multilateral and unilateral strategies.
Academic References on Multilateralism vs. Unilateralism
- Baldwin, D. A. (Ed.). (2003). Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press.
- Biersteker, T. J., & Weber, C. (Eds.). (2013). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press.
- Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2000). International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford University Press.
- Drezner, D. W. (2007). All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton University Press.
- Haas, E. B., & Dunn, C. P. (Eds.). (2017). Theorizing Crisis Communication. Routledge.
- Hurrell, A., & Woods, N. (Eds.). (2017). Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford University Press.
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.
- Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Longman.
- Kindleberger, C. P., & Aliber, R. Z. (2011). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Lake, D. A. (2016). Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell University Press.
- Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Naim, M. (2005). Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy. Anchor Books.
- Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization. Princeton University Press.
- Slaughter, A. M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton University Press.