Cold War after the end of WW2

Cold War: End of World War II

Cold War was a period of intense rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union after World War II ended in 1945. They competed for global influence, built up their military forces, and raced to develop nuclear weapons, lasting until the early 1990s without direct conflict.

End of World War II

Overview

The conclusion of World War II marked the onset of a new era in global politics, characterized by simmering tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. This period, known as the Cold War, endured for nearly five decades, shaping international relations, economics, and even culture. At its core, the Cold War was fueled by ideological differences and a fierce competition for global supremacy between the two superpowers. This article by Academic Block examine the complex origins of the Cold War, and how the aftermath of World War II laid the groundwork for the intense rivalry that defined much of the 20th century.

The End of World War II: Seeds of Discord

End of World War II

As Allied forces celebrated victory over the Axis powers in 1945, the euphoria of triumph was soon overshadowed by the realization that the wartime alliance between the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union was a fragile one, held together by the common enemy of Nazi Germany. With the defeat of Hitler’s regime, the underlying tensions and conflicting interests among the Allies came to the fore.

Ideological Differences: The Clash of Capitalism and Communism The ideological chasm between the United States and the Soviet Union formed the bedrock of the emerging Cold War. The U.S. championed capitalism, individual liberties, and free-market economics, while the Soviet Union advocated for communism, collective ownership of the means of production, and centralized planning. These competing ideologies fueled mutual suspicion and distrust, as each side viewed the other as an existential threat to its way of life.

Competition for Global Influence: The Quest for Dominance Beyond ideological disparities, the post-war landscape was characterized by a scramble for global influence and strategic dominance. Both the United States and the Soviet Union sought to extend their spheres of influence, leading to a series of proxy conflicts and geopolitical maneuvering across the globe. From Europe to Asia, Africa to Latin America, the superpowers vied for control, often backing opposing factions and governments in a bid to expand their power and undermine their rival.

The Yalta and Potsdam Conferences: Fractures in the Alliance

The Yalta Conference in February 1945 and the Potsdam Conference in July-August 1945, where the Allied leaders convened to discuss the post-war order, highlighted the growing rift between the United States and the Soviet Union. While these summits were intended to forge a consensus on the reconstruction of Europe and the establishment of a new world order, they instead laid bare the divergent interests and visions of the two emerging superpowers.

Yalta Conference: Divisions over Eastern Europe At Yalta, tensions simmered over the fate of Eastern Europe, particularly Poland, which had borne the brunt of Nazi occupation. The Soviet Union sought to establish a sphere of influence in Eastern Europe, installing communist governments sympathetic to Moscow’s interests. In contrast, the United States and Britain were wary of Soviet expansionism, advocating for the principles of self-determination and democratic governance in the region. Despite the signing of the Yalta Agreement, which ostensibly outlined a framework for post-war cooperation, the seeds of mistrust were sown.

Potsdam Conference: Discord over Germany and Reparations The Potsdam Conference, held after the defeat of Germany, further exacerbated tensions between the Allies. Disagreements arose over the demarcation of occupation zones in Germany, the issue of war reparations, and the fate of Nazi war criminals. The Soviet Union, having suffered immense losses during the war, insisted on substantial reparations from Germany to aid in its reconstruction efforts. However, the United States and Britain, mindful of the need to rebuild Germany as a bulwark against Soviet influence, opposed excessive reparations that could cripple the German economy and sow resentment among the population.

The Division of Europe: The Iron Curtain Descends

The aftermath of World War II witnessed the gradual division of Europe into two ideological blocs, as the Iron Curtain descended across the continent, separating the capitalist West from the communist East. This division, epitomized by Winston Churchill’s famous speech in Fulton, Missouri in 1946, marked the onset of the Cold War in earnest.

The Truman Doctrine and Containment: In 1947, President Harry Truman articulated the doctrine of containment, which served as the cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War. Under the auspices of containment, the United States committed itself to preventing the spread of communism and Soviet expansionism, employing diplomatic, economic, and military means to shore up vulnerable nations and regions. The Truman Doctrine set the stage for U.S. intervention in conflicts such as the Greek Civil War and the Berlin Airlift, signaling America’s determination to resist Soviet encroachment.

The Marshall Plan and Economic Reconstruction: Concurrently, the United States launched the Marshall Plan in 1948, a massive aid program aimed at revitalizing war-torn Europe and bolstering the economies of Western European countries. By providing financial assistance and technical expertise, the Marshall Plan not only facilitated post-war reconstruction but also served as a bulwark against communist influence. The Soviet Union and its satellite states in Eastern Europe, however, viewed the Marshall Plan as a form of economic imperialism and rejected its overtures.

The Formation of Military Alliances: NATO and the Warsaw Pact

As tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union escalated, both sides sought to consolidate their respective alliances and military capabilities to deter aggression and project power on the global stage.

NATO: A Collective Defense Pact In 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established, bringing together the United States, Canada, and Western European nations in a collective defense alliance against the perceived threat of Soviet expansionism. NATO’s founding marked a significant departure from traditional U.S. isolationism, as America assumed a leadership role in safeguarding the security and stability of the Western world. The presence of U.S. troops and military bases in Europe underscored America’s commitment to deterring Soviet aggression and defending its allies.

The Warsaw Pact: Soviet Response to NATO In response to NATO’s formation, the Soviet Union formed the Warsaw Pact in 1955, comprising the communist states of Eastern Europe, including East Germany, Poland, and Czechoslovakia. The Warsaw Pact served as a counterbalance to NATO and reinforced Soviet hegemony in the region, providing a collective defense mechanism against potential Western incursions. The proliferation of military alliances on both sides of the Iron Curtain heightened tensions and raised the specter of nuclear confrontation.

Proxy Conflicts and the Global Reach of the Cold War

The Cold War played out on multiple fronts, from the Korean Peninsula to the jungles of Southeast Asia, as the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in proxy conflicts and covert operations to advance their respective agendas.

The Korean War: A Prelude to Superpower Rivalry The Korean War, which erupted in 1950 following the invasion of South Korea by communist forces from the North, served as a harbinger of the global struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. Backed by the Soviet Union and China, North Korea sought to reunify the peninsula under communist rule, while South Korea, supported by the United States and its allies, fought to preserve its independence and democracy. The Korean War showcased the dangers of proxy warfare and the potential for escalation in the Cold War era.

The Vietnam War: A Protracted Conflict The Vietnam War, often regarded as one of the most contentious and divisive conflicts of the Cold War era, exemplified the struggle for influence in Southeast Asia. Beginning in the late 1950s and continuing into the 1970s, the war pitted the communist forces of North Vietnam and the Viet Cong against the U.S.-backed government of South Vietnam. The United States intervened in an attempt to prevent the spread of communism in the region, viewing Vietnam as a critical battleground in the broader Cold War struggle. However, despite significant military and economic investment, the war ultimately ended in a humiliating defeat for the United States, underscoring the limits of its power and the complexities of counterinsurgency warfare.

Proxy Wars in the Middle East and Latin America: Beyond Asia, the Cold War extended its reach into the Middle East and Latin America, where the United States and the Soviet Union competed for influence through proxy conflicts and covert interventions. In the Middle East, the Arab-Israeli conflict became a focal point of superpower rivalry, with both the United States and the Soviet Union providing military assistance to their respective allies. Similarly, in Latin America, the United States supported authoritarian regimes and counterinsurgency campaigns to suppress leftist movements perceived as aligned with Soviet interests. These proxy wars and interventions fueled instability and conflict in regions far removed from the epicenter of the Cold War.

Nuclear Arms Race and the Threat of Mutual Assured Destruction

Central to the Cold War dynamic was the specter of nuclear annihilation, as the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a frenzied arms race, stockpiling ever-increasing numbers of nuclear weapons.

Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): The doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) emerged as a central tenet of nuclear deterrence during the Cold War. According to MAD, the possession of nuclear weapons by both superpowers ensured that any large-scale nuclear attack would result in the total annihilation of both sides. This precarious balance of terror, characterized by the constant threat of nuclear retaliation, served as a deterrent against preemptive strikes and helped maintain a fragile peace between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Arms Control Agreements and Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT): Despite the existential risks posed by nuclear weapons, both the United States and the Soviet Union recognized the need for arms control agreements to prevent a catastrophic escalation of hostilities. Throughout the Cold War, various treaties and negotiations sought to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons and reduce the risk of accidental conflict. The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) between the United States and the Soviet Union in the 1970s resulted in landmark agreements to cap the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and strategic bombers, albeit with mixed success.

Thawing Relations and the End of the Cold War

The latter half of the 20th century witnessed periods of détente and thawing relations between the United States and the Soviet Union, as both sides recognized the futility of perpetual confrontation and the need for dialogue and cooperation.

Détente: Easing of Tensions Détente, characterized by a relaxation of tensions and a willingness to engage in diplomatic dialogue, emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a response to the escalating costs of the Cold War arms race. Strategic arms limitation agreements, cultural exchanges, and diplomatic overtures marked this period of détente, as both the United States and the Soviet Union sought to de-escalate conflicts and reduce the risk of nuclear confrontation.

The Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Collapse of the Soviet Union: The turning point in the Cold War came with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. The end of communist rule in Eastern Europe and the dissolution of the Soviet bloc marked the triumph of liberal democracy and capitalism over communism. The Cold War, which had defined global geopolitics for nearly half a century, came to an abrupt and unexpected end, signaling a new era of uncertainty and transition in international relations.

Final Words

The Cold War, which began as World War II ended, was a defining geopolitical struggle that shaped the course of the 20th century. Rooted in ideological differences and fueled by a relentless quest for global supremacy, the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union touched every corner of the globe, leaving a legacy of conflict, division, and uncertainty in its wake. While the Cold War officially ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union, its reverberations continue to be felt in contemporary geopolitics, underscoring the enduring significance of this transformative era in world history. Hope you enjoyed reading with Academic Block. Before leaving, please provide your valuable thoughts to make this article better. Thanks for reading!

This Article will answer your questions like:

+ What was the Cold War after WW2? >

The Cold War was a prolonged state of political and military tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, starting after World War II and lasting until the early 1990s. It involved ideological conflict, arms races, and proxy wars without direct military conflict between the two superpowers.

+ Why is it called the Cold War? >

It is called the Cold War because it never escalated into direct military conflict (a "hot" war) between the United States and the Soviet Union. Instead, it was characterized by political, economic, and propaganda battles, along with proxy wars in other countries.

+ What happened after the Cold War? >

After the Cold War, the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, leading to the emergence of independent republics. The United States emerged as the world's sole superpower. The end of the Cold War also led to significant political, economic, and social changes in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet states.

+ What were the main ideological differences between the USA and the Soviet Union during the Cold War? >

The main ideological differences were capitalism versus communism. The USA advocated for free-market capitalism, democratic governance, and individual freedoms. The Soviet Union promoted a state-controlled economy, single-party rule, and the collective ownership of resources, aiming for a classless society.

+ How did the end of World War II lead to the beginning of the Cold War? >

The end of World War II left the USA and the Soviet Union as the world's two dominant powers. Their differing ideologies and visions for post-war reconstruction led to mutual distrust and competition, sparking the geopolitical struggle known as the Cold War.

+ What were the key events that contributed to the start of the Cold War? >

Key events included the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences, the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, the Berlin Blockade, and the establishment of NATO. These events highlighted the growing rift between the USA and the Soviet Union, setting the stage for the Cold War.

+ Why did tensions rise between the USA and the Soviet Union after World War II? >

Tensions rose due to ideological differences, competition for global influence, and mutual distrust. The Soviet Union sought to expand its influence in Eastern Europe, while the USA aimed to contain communism and promote democracy and capitalism, leading to conflicts and confrontations.

+ What role did the Yalta Conference play in the onset of the Cold War? >

The Yalta Conference in 1945, where Allied leaders met to discuss post-war Europe, sowed seeds of mistrust. Agreements on the division of Germany and the fate of Eastern Europe exposed ideological rifts between the USA and the Soviet Union, contributing to Cold War tensions.

+ How did the Truman Doctrine shape US foreign policy during the early Cold War period? >

The Truman Doctrine, announced in 1947, pledged US support for countries resisting communism. It marked a shift to a policy of containment, providing economic and military aid to prevent the spread of Soviet influence, shaping US foreign policy throughout the Cold War.

+ What was the significance of the Marshall Plan in the context of the Cold War? >

The Marshall Plan, launched in 1948, provided economic aid to rebuild Western European economies after World War II. It was significant in the Cold War context as it aimed to prevent the spread of communism by stabilizing and strengthening democratic nations.

+ How did the division of Germany contribute to Cold War tensions? >

The division of Germany into East and West, and Berlin's partition, became a focal point of Cold War tensions. The contrasting political and economic systems in East (communist) and West (capitalist) Germany exemplified the broader ideological conflict, leading to crises like the Berlin Blockade and Airlift.

Impact of the Cold War after the end of World War II

Division of Europe: The ideological and geopolitical differences between the United States and the Soviet Union led to the division of Europe into two blocs: the capitalist West and the communist East. This division, symbolized by the Iron Curtain, had far-reaching consequences for European nations, resulting in the establishment of satellite states loyal to either the United States or the Soviet Union.

Arms Race and Military Buildup: The competition for global influence between the United States and the Soviet Union fueled an arms race of unprecedented proportions. Both superpowers devoted significant resources to developing nuclear weapons, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and conventional military forces, leading to a proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and heightening the risk of nuclear war.

Proxy Conflicts and Wars: The Cold War era witnessed numerous proxy conflicts and wars fought between allies of the United States and the Soviet Union. These conflicts, including the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and various conflicts in Africa and Latin America, resulted in immense human suffering and geopolitical instability as rival factions received support from their respective superpower patrons.

Space Exploration and Technology: The Cold War spurred rapid advancements in science, technology, and space exploration as the United States and the Soviet Union competed to achieve milestones in space. The launch of Sputnik by the Soviet Union in 1957 and the subsequent space race led to significant innovations in rocketry, telecommunications, and computer technology, with lasting implications for modern society.

Nuclear Deterrence and Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD): The doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD) emerged as a central tenet of Cold War strategy, whereby the possession of nuclear weapons by both superpowers served as a deterrent against nuclear aggression. The constant threat of nuclear annihilation influenced military and diplomatic decision-making, shaping Cold War policies and crises such as the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Globalization of the Cold War: The rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union extended beyond Europe to encompass regions across the globe, as both superpowers sought to exert influence and control through alliances, economic aid, and military interventions. The Cold War became a truly global conflict, with implications for countries in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.

Economic Competition and Ideological Propaganda: The Cold War also manifested as an economic competition between the capitalist West and the communist East, with each side seeking to promote its economic model as superior. The United States promoted free-market capitalism and democracy through initiatives such as the Marshall Plan, while the Soviet Union advocated for communism and centralized planning. Ideological propaganda campaigns were waged to win hearts and minds around the world, shaping public opinion and political discourse.

Human Rights and Civil Liberties: The Cold War era saw significant debates and struggles over human rights and civil liberties, as both superpowers sought to portray themselves as champions of freedom and democracy. However, Cold War rivalries often led to the suppression of dissent and the curtailment of civil liberties, particularly in authoritarian regimes aligned with either the United States or the Soviet Union.

Controversies related to the Cold War after World War II

Origins of the Cold War: One of the most contentious debates among historians revolves around the origins of the Cold War. While some argue that the Cold War was primarily the result of ideological differences and Soviet expansionism, others contend that actions taken by the United States, such as the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, played a significant role in exacerbating tensions with the Soviet Union.

Responsibility for the Division of Europe: The division of Europe into two blocs, with the Soviet Union controlling Eastern Europe and the United States exerting influence in Western Europe, remains a subject of controversy. Critics of the United States argue that American policies, such as the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan, contributed to the division of Europe by alienating the Soviet Union and promoting Western hegemony.

Nuclear Arms Race: The escalation of the nuclear arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union raised significant ethical and moral concerns. Critics questioned the wisdom of building ever-larger stockpiles of nuclear weapons, which posed existential risks to humanity and could potentially lead to catastrophic nuclear war.

Proxy Conflicts and Interventions: The Cold War era was marked by numerous proxy conflicts and interventions, often carried out by the United States and the Soviet Union in pursuit of their geopolitical interests. Critics argue that these interventions often resulted in human rights abuses, destabilization of regions, and the suppression of democratic movements.

Impact on Third World Countries: The Cold War had a profound impact on countries in the developing world, as they became battlegrounds for ideological and geopolitical struggles between the superpowers. Critics contend that the United States and the Soviet Union exploited and manipulated conflicts in these countries for their own strategic interests, leading to widespread suffering and economic exploitation.

Surveillance and Espionage: Both the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in extensive surveillance and espionage activities during the Cold War, leading to controversies over violations of privacy and civil liberties. Revelations about government surveillance programs, such as the U.S. National Security Agency’s monitoring of communications, have raised ethical and legal questions about the balance between national security and individual rights.

Cultural and Propaganda Wars: The Cold War saw the proliferation of propaganda and cultural warfare as both the United States and the Soviet Union sought to influence public opinion and promote their respective ideologies. Controversies arose over censorship, government control of information, and the manipulation of media for political purposes.

Facts on the Cold War after the end of World War II

Potsdam Conference: Held in July-August 1945, the Potsdam Conference was attended by the leaders of the victorious Allied powers – the United States, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain. Tensions were evident during the conference, particularly regarding the division of Germany and the issue of war reparations, laying the groundwork for the Cold War.

Truman Doctrine: In 1947, President Harry Truman announced the Truman Doctrine, which outlined the United States’ commitment to containing the spread of communism, particularly in Europe. This policy marked a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy towards a more aggressive stance against Soviet influence.

Marshall Plan: Also in 1947, the United States initiated the Marshall Plan, a massive economic aid program aimed at rebuilding war-torn Europe. While the plan was ostensibly about reconstruction, it also served as a means of preventing the spread of communism by fostering economic stability and prosperity in Western Europe.

Formation of NATO: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established in 1949 as a collective defense alliance comprising the United States, Canada, and several Western European nations. NATO’s formation was a response to the perceived threat posed by Soviet expansionism, particularly in Eastern Europe.

Berlin Blockade and Airlift: In 1948, the Soviet Union blockaded West Berlin in an attempt to force the Western powers out of the city. In response, the United States and its allies launched the Berlin Airlift, supplying the city with food and supplies via air transport. The Berlin Airlift demonstrated Western resolve in the face of Soviet aggression.

Formation of the Warsaw Pact: In 1955, the Soviet Union established the Warsaw Pact, a military alliance comprising several Eastern European countries, in response to the formation of NATO. The Warsaw Pact served as a counterbalance to NATO and solidified Soviet control over Eastern Europe.

Korean War: The Korean War erupted in 1950 when North Korea, supported by China and the Soviet Union, invaded South Korea. The United States and its allies intervened on behalf of South Korea, leading to a protracted conflict that further heightened tensions between the superpowers.

Space Race: The Space Race, which began in the late 1950s, was a competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to achieve significant milestones in space exploration. Key events include the Soviet launch of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite, in 1957, and the U.S. Apollo moon landing in 1969. The Space Race symbolized the technological and ideological competition between the two superpowers.

Cuban Missile Crisis: In 1962, the world came to the brink of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The crisis was sparked by the discovery of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles from the coast of the United States. Tensions eased after a tense standoff, but the incident highlighted the dangers of nuclear brinkmanship.

Détente: Détente, a period of improved relations between the United States and the Soviet Union, began in the late 1960s and lasted until the late 1970s. During this time, both superpowers engaged in arms control negotiations and cultural exchanges, signaling a temporary thaw in Cold War tensions.

Popular Statements given on the Cold War after the end of World War II

Winston Churchill: “From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the continent.” Churchill’s speech at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, in 1946 coined the term “iron curtain” to describe the division of Europe between the communist East and the capitalist West, highlighting the growing tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Harry S. Truman: “It must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.” Truman articulated the Truman Doctrine in 1947, outlining the United States’ commitment to containing the spread of communism and providing support to nations threatened by Soviet aggression.

George F. Kennan: “Containment is a policy of calculated and gradual coercion.” Kennan, a U.S. diplomat and architect of the containment policy, outlined his strategy for dealing with Soviet expansionism in his famous “Long Telegram” in 1946. The policy of containment became a central tenet of U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War.

Joseph Stalin: “The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” Stalin’s statement, attributed to him in the context of Soviet industrialization and the spread of communism, reflected his belief in the inevitability of the downfall of capitalism and the eventual triumph of communism.

Nikita Khrushchev: “We will bury you!”. Khrushchev’s remark, made during a speech to Western ambassadors in 1956, was interpreted as a threat of Soviet superiority and the eventual demise of capitalism. It underscored the confrontational rhetoric of the Cold War era.

John F. Kennedy: “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty. Kennedy’s inaugural address in 1961 reflected the United States’ commitment to defending freedom and democracy against the perceived threat of communism, encapsulating the spirit of the Cold War struggle.

Nikita Khrushchev (again): “We will bury you in your own struggle!”. Khrushchev’s statement, made in 1961, echoed his earlier remarks and underscored the Soviet Union’s determination to outlast and outcompete the capitalist West in the ideological struggle of the Cold War.

Academic References on the Cold War after World War II

Books:

  1. Gaddis, J. L. (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Books.
  2. Leffler, M. P. (2008). For the Soul of Mankind: The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Cold War. Hill and Wang.
  3. Westad, O. A. (2012). The Cold War: A World History. Basic Books.
  4. Zubok, V. M. (2007). A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev. University of North Carolina Press.
  5. Hixson, W. L. (2016). The Cold War: A History in Documents and Eyewitness Accounts. Oxford University Press.
  6. Gaddis, J. L. (1998). We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford University Press.
  7. LaFeber, W. (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945-2002. McGraw-Hill.
  8. Mcmahon, R. (2003). The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  9. Painter, D. S. (2017). The Cold War: An International History. Routledge.
  10. Hogan, M. J. (2015). The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952. Cambridge University Press.

Journal Articles:

  1. Gaddis, J. L. (1992). International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. International Security, 17(3), 5-58.
  2. Leffler, M. P. (1992). Inside Enemy Archives: The Cold War Reopened. Foreign Affairs, 71(4), 105-122.
  3. Zubok, V. M. (1994). Gorbachev’s Interpretation of the End of the Cold War: A Critical Assessment. Cold War History, 1(1), 115-131.
  4. Hixson, W. L. (2009). Was the Cold War an Inevitable Result of World War II? A Stimulus-Based Inquiry Lesson. The History Teacher, 42(2), 243-252.
  5. Westad, O. A. (2005). The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge University Press.
  6. LaFeber, W. (1989). The American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad Since 1750. W.W. Norton & Company.
  7. Mcmahon, R. (2000). American National Identity and the Ideological Cold War. Diplomatic History, 24(2), 235-257.
  8. Painter, D. S. (2007). Ideological Origins of the Cold War. Diplomatic History, 31(1), 91-110.
  9. Hogan, M. J. (2001). The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947-1952. Reviews in American History, 29(3), 432-437.
  10. Gaddis, J. L. (2009). The Cold War: What Do “We Now Know”? American Historical Review, 114(1), 146-157.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x